Beijing has been inspecting and closing factories for some time, yet it seems the full effect is starting to be obvious to all. Supply chains get disrupted, many production lines are stopped, and an increasing number of importers are suffering long delays.
There has been no shortage of articles on this topic. Here are a few recent ones (all were published in September):
- China to send over 100 pollution inspection teams to cities around Beijing (South China Morning Post)
- China punishes 18,000 companies for pollution (Straight Times)
- China’s environmental crackdown dries up lead supply amid demand surge (Reuters)
I thought I’d write responses to the most frequent questions I am asked. This is based on a lot of hearsay from a number of sources (suppliers, our team, clients, etc.) so I can’t be 100% sure of any fact.
Q: What exactly happens? Are factories shut down forever?
There are different cases:
- Some closures are definitive — that’s the worst case, where government inspectors find a really bad situation and the managers are in legal trouble.
- Some closures are temporary (sometimes preventive in nature… the boss decides to close when he hears the inspectors are coming to his area).
- Some delays come from sneaky suppliers trying to remain under the radar by producing at night with a smaller crew.
- Some operations were pretty close to bankruptcy and the owner used the threat of inspections as an excuse to disappear without paying his suppliers.
Q: Is it all over China?
It seems like the inspectors move around from one area to the next in teams. They were quite active in Guangdong, then in Zhejiang, then in some Northern provinces and in Jiangxi, and so on. Again, this is based on hearsay and I don’t have any overall number.
Q: What supply chains are most at risk?
Any supply chain that includes polluting activities (be it a tier-1, a tier-2, a tier-3… supplier) faces a risk. Let’s take three examples:
- Many metal auto parts necessitate plating, anodizing, e-coating, or another finishing (and typically very polluting) treatment. This is often done at a subcontractor chosen by the main manufacturer that might do machining and assembly operations (not highly at risk, as long as they don’t do die casting).
- Virtually all garments are made out of fabric that was dyed, and most fabric mills release untreated waste water. In some areas, all fabric mills had to close.
- Many home appliance components need to be painted (usually powder coated) and release much pollutant. In maybe 60% of cases this is done in-house by the main manufacturer, so the risk is substantially higher. Last year many component suppliers were closed in Shenzhen and the major appliance brands were strongly impacted.
We gave a few more examples in a previous article.
Q: As a buyer, what can I do to avoid disruption in my supply chain?
The first step is to understand the structure of your supply chain: what processes are done by the direct supplier, by the sub-suppliers, by the sub-sub-suppliers, and so on.
The second step is to zero in on the potentially polluting processes. If the manufacturers handling them are low-cost and small-to-midsize suppliers, chances are very high they are polluting more than Beijing tolerates.
The third step is to try to move those processes to more environmentally-responsible suppliers, if at all possible. And yes, this will come at a higher cost.
As you can guess, this will necessitate a relatively open-book supplier relationship. And this is a rare bird in China. You might have to move away from your current suppliers and restructure your entire supply chain…
I wrote about this before:
Q: Won’t Beijing become more business-friendly in order to keep the GDP growth and employment numbers up?
I believe air pollution has become a serious political issue. And water pollution is a serious public health issue. And that’s more important than 1 point of GDP growth to China’s government, I feel.
There has been pressure for quite some time but anti-pollution inspections really had teeth when Beijing found a way to do two things:
- Include pollution among the KPIs of local officials.
- Go over local government officials and avoid their interference.
Q: Why are so many Chinese factories polluting more than they are allowed?
I guess there are three main reasons.
First, most Chinese entrepreneurs are short-term focused and uncertain about the future. Why invest in better, cleaner processes when one’s wife keeps pushing for more cash and for buying more real estate?
Second, many factory owners have been able to escape any significant fine for years by playing buddies with local officials or by paying bribes to inspectors. They see this as cheaper than full compliance.
Third, China-based manufacturers are not aware of all the ways they can reduce pollution and save money at the same time. This article contains quite a few examples.
Q: Will many factories relocate out of China?
Most factories that would relocate to another Asian country, and keep their focus on low costs, would still buy most of their components from China… and would still be exposed to production delays. (Remember, most of the impact is on component suppliers.) So I don’t see any massive exodus.
As for the theory that other Asian countries are more welcoming of polluting activities, I am not sure it stands on its two feet. Do you remember, a few years ago, when China announced its plan to raise the minimum salary consistently? Many other low-cost Asian countries decided to do the same. I hope they are also taking note of the stricter enforcement of anti-pollution rules in China and they will imitate it too.
Do you have any other question?
Brad Pritts says
One suggestion I found from another source (the US-China Business Council) had a good idea. Check with your suppliers, and their subsuppliers, regarding their physical location and the local government’s plans/ expectations for that area. Some areas are designated as proper zones for more environmentally troublesome operations. We found that certain areas are designated acceptable for e-coating and other areas are not. Additionally, one of our suppliers has advised that the local government plans to redevelop the district where their factory is located as a residential area; and so the factory will need to move. It may not be easy to get full transparency on this point but it’s worth the effort.
A second suggestion from our experience. We found that typical e-coating costs in the USA are considerably lower than e-coat costs in China — and, US product performance is much better. Our domestic e-coater gets 950 hours salt spray performance vs. only 350 – 500 hours for the Chinese e-coat. So we are studying our options for purchasing the product unfinished, and doing e-coat in USA. Obviously we need to figure out how much rust we may see during the shipping time to see if this is feasible.
Renaud Anjoran says
Oh yes these are great suggestions. Thanks Brad!
I never heard of making a product in country A and doing surface treatments in country B. But you are right, it might be feasible and cheaper!