QualityInspection.org

Quality Assurance, Product Development, and Purchasing Strategies in China

  • Home
  • Articles
    • An Importer’s Guide to New Product Manufacturing in China
  • Best Of
  • About Us
  • Contact us
X

Don't miss a post

It's easy to subscribe to our newsletter where you'll receive weekly updates for professional importers and manufacturers on better understanding, controlling, and improving manufacturing & supply chain in China.

You are here: Home / Supplier Management / Frustrations of importers in China: a Gartner study

Frustrations of importers in China: a Gartner study

September 8, 2010

Supplier ManagementI just found an article on supplychain.com entitled Buyers find pitfalls of China sourcing (h/t to @MaxHenry). It is based on a survey of importers by a consultancy (Gartner). I listed below the main frustrations that were mentioned:

Vendors using fake certificates

Sometimes Chinese suppliers bought fake certificates attesting to ISO quality standards, Six Sigma and social compliance, which prove hard to detect.

This is a classic. Don’t trust any paper here–everything can be faked. Buyers who need to know have to pay for it (e.g. paying for third-party lab testing, or conducting a factory audit).

Price increases

Some manufacturers accept orders, receive deposits, and then ask for a price increase. Sometimes they simply want to make more margin. Sometimes they notice the products are more complex to make that they thought. And sometimes they are very busy and they don’t want the order.

How to react in this situation, if you really need the factory to produce that order for you? See the last post on the SRI blog to see how some real professionals do.

Reducing production quality over time

Many Chinese suppliers reduce product quality over time in order to increase their margins and profits. Typically this happens after the first few orders, whereby a product’s ingredients or subcomponents are altered without changing the outward appearance, making it difficult to detect.

That’s exactly what Paul Midler calls quality fade. Sometimes it is deliberate, other times it is a natural degradation in the quality standard.

In any case, experienced purchasers keep inspecting and testing their products over time, not only for the first order.

Ignoring delivery times and patents

Gartner also found little or no respect for sticking to delivery times and the violation of patents which can result in lawsuits for infringements.

These are two separate issues, calling for different solutions. Penalties for late shipment can help reduce delays. And a good “NNN” contract can reduce intellectual property violation risks.

———

I would add one more frustration that I hear all the time: the unwillingness of Chinese suppliers to be responsible for quality issues in their past shipments.

Any other problem that keeps bothering you?

Filed Under: Supplier Management


Weekly updates for professional importers on better understanding, controlling, and improving manufacturing & supply chain in China.

This is the official blog of Sofeast.com.

This blog is written by Renaud Anjoran, an ASQ Certified Quality Engineer who has been involved in chinese manufacturing since 2005.

Hit the button below to get in touch:

Contact Us!

Subscribe to our email newsletter

Connect with us

  • Email
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
sofeast
sofeast
sofeast

Latest Articles

  • The New Apparel Development & Production Process [Podcast]
  • Going from 1 Prototype to Mass Production directly is Dangerous
  • Should North American Importers Leave China For Countries Like Mexico or Vietnam? (Feat. Andrew Hupert) [Podcast]
  • Inspecting Productions with Very Few Defects: Dump the AQL
  • Answering Your Questions on Fabric Quality, US Tariffs, & Volatile Material Prices.

Categories

  • Quality Control Tips
  • Sourcing New Suppliers
  • Supplier Management
  • New Product Development
  • Process Improvement
  • Ethical Sourcing

Archives

© 2022 QualityInspection.org