Hardly a week goes by without someone asking me for contacts of “good factories”. We see so many of them, the thinking goes, surely we know a few good ones.
When we did a few trade shows in Hong Kong, 7-8 years ago, it came up roughly every 30 minutes.
Why wouldn’t we do that? For several reasons.
The short answer is “we promise confidentiality to our clients, therefore we can’t share what we have learned when working for one client with another client”.
Some people get this right away and respect us for this. Other people are capable of arguing for hours about this. Their thinking goes this way: we are not hurting our current/past client by sharing this information, but we are hurting the good suppliers out there, and it can also benefit us if we get a few % of the order (as an agent), it is a win-win-win situation, and so on and so forth.
2. Absence of bias
If we say “these guys are good” and then we are to audit their factory and/or inspect their productions, doesn’t something sound wrong here?
As Brad Pritts suggested a few years ago, a good analogy is with a judge in the US. “Each judge should try to avoid all appearance of bias as well as actual bias.”
3. Is there such a thing as a “good factory” in the absolute?
What is a good supplier to one company for a certain period of time is a bad supplier to another company. (And this also requires some explaining.)
I was glad to see that one of rules of the Asia Importal Facebook group is as follows:
We generally don’t recommend suppliers or provide suppliers lists, as we don’t think that suppliers can be divided into “good” or “bad” suppliers.
I agree! Let’s take an example.
Apple works with a famous contract manufacturer (everyone has heard of them). The products they make for Apple are truly first class — in the millions of pieces, with very fast ramp up and pretty close to zero defect.
Well, that same manufacturer also produces batches (for other customers) that would not be acceptable for sale in Walmart or Testco, and sometimes even cheats on components. I know it because we have detected these issues while looking out for the interests of a client.
How is that possible? Well, on the one hand Apple’s business is something they value. And, perhaps more important, Apple spends a lot of efforts validating their production & testing processes before launching mass production, not to mention all their monitoring all along production.
If, on the other hand, an unknown buyer comes in the picture, gives them a 50,000 USD order, and patiently waits for delivery, they might be disappointed. A second- (or third-) rate team will work on your order, and totally different business rules will apply.
A small buyer, in that situation, is actually better off finding and vetting an unknown manufacturer that accepts to sign a balanced contract. Since there is no particular confidence in that manufacturer, the buyer takes precautions. Trust but make sure to verify.
Have you observed the same phenomenon?